Tag
13 articles
Project Maven, once met with skepticism at the Pentagon, has evolved into a crucial component of military AI strategy, demonstrating the military's growing acceptance of artificial intelligence in defense operations.
This article explains the concept of AI safety and how government regulations affect military AI use, using simple analogies and clear examples.
This article explains the concept of lethal autonomous weapons and why they are a growing concern in AI development. It discusses the ethical and safety issues around AI systems that can make life-or-death decisions without human oversight.
This article explains the controversy around AI companies working with military organizations, using the example of OpenAI's deal with the Pentagon and an employee's resignation over the issue.
The Pentagon allegedly tested OpenAI's AI models through Microsoft's platform before the company lifted its military use ban, raising ethical and regulatory concerns.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has publicly criticized OpenAI's messaging around a military AI contract, calling it 'straight up lies.' The controversy stems from Anthropic's decision to terminate its Pentagon partnership over AI safety disagreements, which OpenAI then quickly filled.
Anthropic and the Pentagon are clashing over AI use in autonomous weapons and surveillance, raising high-stakes questions about national security, corporate control, and who sets the rules for military AI.
AI firm Anthropic is in heated negotiations with the Pentagon over military contract terms that would allow broad use of its AI models, including mass surveillance of Americans. The standoff highlights growing tensions between national security interests and ethical AI development.
State assemblymember Alex Bores is advocating for balanced AI governance in New York, navigating the tension between military AI control and public oversight. His efforts aim to create responsible AI policy amid growing resistance to data center development.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei refuses Pentagon's demands for unrestricted AI access, citing ethical concerns. The standoff highlights tensions between government AI ambitions and corporate responsibility.
Anthropic has refused the Pentagon's demands for unrestricted access to its AI systems, citing concerns over lethal autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. The move marks a significant escalation in the debate over military AI development.
Anthropic refuses to loosen its AI restrictions for military use, prompting a Pentagon threat to invoke the Defense Production Act.
